Legal Opinion

City of Muncie v. Pizza Hut of Muncie, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1976No. 2-275A23PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLybrook, J.

The City of Muncie, Indiana, defendant-appellant, appeals from being permanently enjoined and restrained from denying to the plaintiffs the way of ingress and egress to and from their property abutting New York Avenue, and from obstructing such ingress and egress. Appellant raises the following issues for review:(1) Whether the court erred in mandating the City to allow ingress and egress to plaintiffs’ property, absent a finding that the City was abusing its police power?(2) Whether the plaintiffs had an adequate remedy at law, i.e. inverse condemnation, and were therefore not entitled to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Dept. of Financial Institutions v. HOLT, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People v. WeinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Weisenberger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Adult Group Properties, Ltd. v. ImlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Steenhoven v. College Life Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Day v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Ace Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Indianapolis Airport AuthorityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API