Weisenberger v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.
Appellant, by an indictment in two counts, was charged, tried and convicted (Count 1) of unlawfully manufacturing bed mattresses from material known as “shoddy,” and (Count 2) of unlawfully selling and offering to sell bed mattresses manufactured out of material known as “shoddy.” Acts 1917 p. 435, §8250 Burns. 1926.
Appellant assigns as errors the overruling of his motion to quash the indictment, and the overruling of his motion for a new trial. In support of both of these assignments, he asserts that the statute upon which the indictment is based is unconstitutional and void, for the reason…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Price v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Dept. of Financial Institutions v. HOLT, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Kirtley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Hanley v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERVATIONIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.