Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kula v. Prososki

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1988No. 86-305PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

This is the second appearance of this case; our former opinion in Kula v. Prososki is reported at 219 Neb. 626, 365 N.W.2d 441 (1985) (Kula I). This was a suit for injunctive relief and damages arising out of the acts of the County of Nance (County) and others in impeding the flow of surface waters off the land of the plaintiff. The trial court enjoined the defendants Prososki from restricting the flow of water in certain depressions, and ordered the defendant County of Nance to construct a culvert under a county road sufficient in capacity to drain the farmlands of the plaintiff. The court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gledhill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Gable v. the Pathfinder Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Miller v. SabinskeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fisbeck v. Scherbarth, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pribil v. KoinzanNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Southern Lumber & Coal Co. v. M. P. Olson Real Estate & Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Keitges v. VanDermeulenNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Grone v. Lincoln Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API