Legal Opinion

Keitges v. VanDermeulen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1992No. S-89-445PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, James and Cheryl Keitges, to recover damages for the destruction of trees, shrubs, and vegetation on their property when the defendant, Darrell S. VanDermeulen, attempted to clear a path for the construction of a fence. The defendant’s property is adjacent to the plaintiffs’ land.

In the first cause of action of the amended petition, the plaintiffs sought treble damages under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2130 (Reissue 1989) for willful trespass. In the second cause of action the plaintiffs sought damages for negligent trespass. The jury found that the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. State v. MessersmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Schiltz v. Cullen-Schiltz & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Thatcher v. Lane Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Denoyer v. LambOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Von R. Trimble, Jr. v. Asarco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Vaught v. A.O. Hardee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. O'CONNOR v. KaufmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. George E. Morabit v. Dennis HoagSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API