Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Justice.
The plaintiffs instituted this action seeking damages from the defendant for injury to their lands and for damages for loss of crops.
Plaintiffs Groom and wife are in possession of the real property, the subject of this action, which is situate a short distance west of Meridian. The Grooms, who are purchasing a portion of the property from Casey and wife, are leasing the rest of the property from plaintiff Biddick, and are farming both tracts. The defendant irrigation district is charged with negligently allowing water to overflow the hanks of its lateral known as the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zenier v. Spokane International Railroad CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Bader v. Mills & Baker Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Young v. Extension Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Risse v. CollinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Williams v. HavensIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Bratton v. SliningerIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Archer v. Shields Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Walker v. American Cyanamid Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.