Legal Opinion
Pribil v. Koinzan
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 2003No. S-01-251PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
BACKGROUND
Lawrence Pribil sued Barton and Sandra Koinzan, Terry Held, and Genevieve Shaw (collectively the defendants) for damages that the Koinzans’ cattle inflicted on Pribil’s mature com and soybean crops on several quarter sections of irrigated land. The Koinzans’ cattle escaped from Shaw’s land and went onto Pribil’s neighboring fields. A summary judgment on the issue of liability was granted, and liability is not disputed in this appeal. In Pribil’s operative petition, he sought $164,079.42 in damages, but the jury returned a verdict for $34,920.60. Pribil appealed, and the Nebraska…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- World Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Lane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Gledhill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Colvin v. John Powell & CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- McWhirt v. HeaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Nebraska Plastics, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Holland Colors Americas, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Trieweiler Ex Rel. Varsity Investments, Inc. v. SearsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Gary's Implement, Inc. v. Bridgeport Tractor Parts, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Nebraska, Inc. v. DaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Eicher v. Mid America Fin. Invest. Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.