Legal Opinion

Lindsay Et Ux. v. Chickasha Building Loan Ass'n.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1913No. 2337PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Grady County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by the Chickasha Building & Loan Association against J. D. Lindsay and wife to foreclose a mortgage and lien on stock. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

In November, 1905, J. D. Lindsay, then a stockholder and member of the board of directors of the 'Chickasha Building & Loan Association, obtained a loan of $400 from said association and executed a note therefor, bearing 6 per cent, per annum, and as a bid for said loan executed a premium note for $540, bearing 8' per cent, per annum, and to secure the payment of said notes, and as part of the same transaction, executed a mortgage on certain lots in the city of Chickasha, and as additional security assigned a certain certificate of stock in said association for $1,000;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reeve v. Ladies' Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  2. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. Anniston Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Freeman v. Ottawa Building, Homestead & Savings Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Andruss v. People's Building, Loan & Saving Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
  5. Roberts v. American Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. DeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Aetna Building & Loan Ass'n v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Collings v. El Reno Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API