Legal Opinion

First National Bank in Manitowoc v. Cincinnati Insurance

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 12, 2004No. 03-C-241PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

GRIESBACH, District Judge.

Plaintiff First National Bank In Manito-woc (“FNB”) claims that Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) and Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”) are liable under their respective bonds for losses sustained by FNB as a result of a fraud committed by one of its customers. FNB has asserted claims for declaratory relief and breach of contract against each defendant and, in addition, alleges that Continental’s denial of coverage constitutes bad faith. The case is presently before me on Continental’s motion for summary judgment. For the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Sedrak v. CallahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  4. Dale & Selby Superette & Deli v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  5. Lindsey v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GENG v. DEL TORODistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
  2. VanDalsen v. RoswarksiDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  3. Young v. Lake County TreasurerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API