First National Bank in Manitowoc v. Cincinnati Insurance
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
GRIESBACH, District Judge.
Plaintiff First National Bank In Manito-woc (“FNB”) claims that Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) and Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”) are liable under their respective bonds for losses sustained by FNB as a result of a fraud committed by one of its customers. FNB has asserted claims for declaratory relief and breach of contract against each defendant and, in addition, alleges that Continental’s denial of coverage constitutes bad faith. The case is presently before me on Continental’s motion for summary judgment. For the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Sedrak v. CallahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Dale & Selby Superette & Deli v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Lindsey v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- GENG v. DEL TORODistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
- VanDalsen v. RoswarksiDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
- Young v. Lake County TreasurerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024