Lindsey v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Justice.
This case has been before this court upon former appeal, 230 Ala. 633, 162 So. 267, wherein the pleading only was considered and the bond of the Standard Company was not set out in haec verba and was not then construed.
There was a decree against the receiver of the Gadsden National Bank for the value of the bonds claimed to have been appropriated, lost, or destroyed while held as bailee of the appellant’s principal and from which no appeal was taken by the receiver or other appellees, nor is there a cross-assignment of error by any of the appellees. So, regardless of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Sprowl v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. DukeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Lindsey v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First National Bank in Manitowoc v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Mars v. Flatiron Services, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1962