Legal Opinion

Curry v. Lake Superior Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. Docket No. 71PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Marquette; Flannigan, J. Bill by Solomon S. Curry against the Lake, Superior Iron Company, a corporation, to set aside certain tax deeds procured by defendant. From a decree for complainant defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

The learned circuit judge properly and concisely states the facts involved in this case as follows:

“The bill of complaint by which this suit was commenced was filed to set aside certain tax deeds of lot 32 of the plat of S. S. Curry’s addition to the city of *446Ishpeming, Marquette county. The material facts are admitted. The government title to the lot in question, except the ores and minerals therein, is in the complainant, and to the ores and minerals, is in the defendant, together with the right to enter on the lot and, by payment of the damages, if any, to the surface improvements…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dubois v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Page v. WebsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Washburn v. Gregory Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Cooley v. WatermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Fletcher v. Township of AlconaMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Dorman v. MinnichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API