Legal Opinion

In Re Petition of Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 122, Calendar No. 36,782PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is a petition, filed February 25, 1932, by Hydro Land Company, to declare void the sale of certain lands for the taxes of 1927, sold under tax decree of 1930.

Petitioner is owner of the fee of the land, except four parcels to which it has oil and gas leases. Prior to the assessment it had sold and conveyed to Iosco Land Company the “flowage rights,” which include right to build dams, canals, waste ways, and power houses, to overflow lands, right of way for access to dams and power lines, right to take lumber, gravel, stone, sand, dirt, and materials from the lands for construction and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Muirhead v. SandsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Fletcher v. Township of AlconaMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Rumsey v. GriffinMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Township of Beaverton v. LordMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Beaverton Power Co. v. Wolverine Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Briggs v. PrevostMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Caplan v. JeromeMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re Petition of Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API