Dorman v. Minnich
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
DALTON, Judge.
This cause comes to the writer on reassignment. It is an action to quiet and determine title to 80 acres of described real estate in Texas County; however, title to only 20 acres is involved in this appeal. ;Some fifty plaintiffs claimed to own the mineral rights in this particularly described .20 acres, some of them claiming as little as .a 1%584 undivided fractional interest therein. While the petition named a number of ■defendants, only J. W. Maples and his wife Minnie D. Maples and Marcus Flatt appeared and defended the action. They claimed the fee simple ownership of both…
Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Snoddy v. BolenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Mitchell v. EspinosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Wardell v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- State Ex Rel. Buder v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- State v. GomerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buck v. LeggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Thomas v. DepaoliMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Thomas v. DepaoliMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989