Legal Opinion · Concurrence

CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1981No. Docket Nos. 60744, 60745. (Calendar No. 3)Published

1ConcurrenceLevin, J.

I am in agreement with Justice Ryan’s analysis and disposition and have therefore signed his opinion. I write separately to address some of the considerations treated in the other opinions.

I

The lease between C.A.F., as lessor, and K-Mart, as lessee, is referred to in Justice Moody’s opinion as an unfavorable lease for the lessor. Justice Fitzgerald’s opinion seems to be saying something akin: that K-Mart was able to receive more favorable lease terms than a more marginal tenant and that that was a factor justifying the Tax Tribunal in not considering actual income. It is further suggested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. CAF Investment Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. NeBoShone Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Fletcher v. Township of AlconaMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. In Re Petition of Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Curry v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API