CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw Township
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceLevin, J.
I am in agreement with Justice Ryan’s analysis and disposition and have therefore signed his opinion. I write separately to address some of the considerations treated in the other opinions.
I
The lease between C.A.F., as lessor, and K-Mart, as lessee, is referred to in Justice Moody’s opinion as an unfavorable lease for the lessor. Justice Fitzgerald’s opinion seems to be saying something akin: that K-Mart was able to receive more favorable lease terms than a more marginal tenant and that that was a factor justifying the Tax Tribunal in not considering actual income. It is further suggested…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- CAF Investment Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- NeBoShone Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fletcher v. Township of AlconaMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- In Re Petition of Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Curry v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916