Legal Opinion
Horowitz v. Bogart
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 5, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The complaint alleges that the defendant is a physician and surgeon duly licensed to practice in the State of New York; that on or about the 12th day of February, 1921, the plaintiff, who at that time was suffering from a malady known as duodenal ulcer, entered into an agreement with the defendant wherein and whereby and for and in consideration of the sum of $150, to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, the defendant agreed to perform a surgical operation on the plaintiff for the removal of the duodenal ulcer from the plaintiff’s body. It is further alleged that the plaintiff performed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frankel v. WolperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Hermes v. Westchester Racing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Hurlburt v. GillettNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- Hurlburt v. GillettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by13 opinions
- Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Barnhoff v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- National Credit Associates, Inc. v. TinkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Monahan v. DevinnyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Budoff v. KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.