Legal Opinion
Hermes v. Westchester Racing Ass'n
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 29, 1925PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAvoy, J.:
Our ruling is not to rest on the term to be given the cause - of action under common-law nomenclature, whether ex delicto or ex contractu. The doubt exists concerning the time of limitation of the commencement of an action of the nature described in the complaint under statutory provisions limiting the time for enforcing a civil remedy now embodied in sections 48, subdivision 1, and 49, subdivision 6, of the Civil Practice Act. (Formerly Code Civ. Proc. §§ 380, 382, subd. 1; Id. § 383, subd. 5.) We are convinced that it is necessary, in view of the language of the sections…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carroll v. . Staten Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Busch v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Webber v. Herkimer & Mohawk Street RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Aplington v. Pullman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
3Cited by18 opinions
- Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Graboi v. KibelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Loehr v. East Side Omnibus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Diver v. MillerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1929
- Schiavone-Bonomo Corp. v. Buffalo Barge Towing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.