Legal Opinion

National Credit Associates, Inc. v. Tinker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1966No. 24374PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

The decisive issue here is whether or not a patient’s suit for damages, alleging fraud in the prescription and application of professional treatment by her physician and commenced more than two years after the date of the last treatment, is barred under the Statute of Limitations requiring suits for malpractice to be brought within two years “ * * * from the date of the act of neglect complained of.”

The parties include the patient, Mrs. Marjorie B. Tinker, who is described in most of the pleadings as “Roberta Tinker”. However, she filed a motion asserting that her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. De TarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Hunter v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Baysinger v. HanserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Shelby County v. BraggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Tulloch v. HaseloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. BolesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Sisters of St. Mary v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Rowland v. Skaggs Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. De Paul Hospital School of Nursing, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API