Legal Opinion

Hicks Rubber Co. v. Harper

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 13, 1939No. 2128PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This suit was brought by J. W. Harper against Hicks Rubber Company to recover damages for certain personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff’s wife. A trial before a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for the sum of $10,000. The defendant appealed.

Appellant’s first major contention is that the court should have given an instructed verdict for the defendant because the evidence conclusively established as a matter of law that Mrs. Harper was guilty of contributory negligence which destroyed her right to recover. The evidence shows…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. RichardsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936
  2. Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. CrowTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Watkins v. HuffTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Armour & Co. v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Traders & General Insurance v. Hicks Rubber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Boehmer v. BoggianoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Cannon v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Galvan v. FedderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Hoke v. PoserTexas Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API