Legal Opinion

Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. Richardson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1936No. 1626—6590PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Commissioner.

Defendant in error Myrtle Richardson, joined by her husband, E. Richardson, recovered judgment against Southern Ice & Utilities Company for injuries alleged to have been sustained by Mrs. Richardson in an automobile accident. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment. 60 S.W. (2d) 308. The company brings error.

The facts alleged are, briefly, that the company’s car was parked with the left wheels near the marked center line of the highway while it was raining; the driver of the car in front of plaintiffs was not able to see through the rain and determine that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southland Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. CottenTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Rio Grande, E. P. & S. F. R. v. DupreeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Armstrong Packing Co. v. Clem.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. T. N. O. R. R. Co. v. McGinnisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GiunTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. International-Great Northern R. v. AckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API