Legal Opinion
In Re OnStar Contract Litigation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 19, 2009No. Case 2:07-MDL-01867PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
SEAN F. COX, District Judge.
Buyers and lessees of automobiles equipped with OnStar telematics brought prospective class action complaints against four automobile manufacturers and OnStar Corporation, asserting consumer protection act and warranty claims. The actions were consolidated for pretrial proceedings by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. After the complaints were combined in a Master Amended Complaint, Defendants filed the instant Motions to Dismiss. The parties have fully briefed the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Ehrlich v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Doll v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Matanky v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.