Legal Opinion

W.D. Yett, Mayor v. Cook

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1926No. 4432PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

On January 2, 1925, Charles B. Cook filed this suit for mandamus against W. D. Yett, Mayor, and other officers of the City of Austin, to secure the issuance of a writ of mandamus requiring the officers named to call an election for Councilmen for the first Monday in February, 1925.

One phase of the controversy was before us last term, and we refer to 0the opinion then rendered for a fuller preliminary statement of the case. 115 Texas, 175, 268 S. W., 715.

A peremptory writ of mandamus was awarded. An appeal was taken by the plaintiffs in error Yett and others, to the extent of giving notice of…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Missouri v. Illinois & the Sanitary DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Brown v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Harris County v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1897

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hunt v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Proctor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1998

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API