Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Lassen Lumber & Box Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 11479PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This action was brought to recover damages growing out of the sale on March 24, 1922, by defendant to plaintiff of a used 80-horsepower return tubular boiler.

The complaint, as finally amended, in substance alleged that prior to March 10, 1922, plaintiff informed defendant that he was about to enter into a contract with a customer, viz., Leal & Sons Lumber Company, for the sale to said company of one 80-horsepower return tubular boiler, in good condition, built for 140 pounds per square inch working pressure, with all necessary fittings, etc.; that defendant stated it was the owner of a boiler…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. California Press Manufacturing Co. v. Stafford Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Stark v. WellmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Big Boy Drilling Corp. v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Peters v. BinnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Farnsworth v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API