City of Peru v. Cox
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Miami Circuit Court; Joseph N. Tillett, Judge. Petition by William H. Cox and others, against which the City of Peru remonstrates. Prom a judgment for petitioners, remonstrant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Appellees petitioned the Miami Circuit Court for the vacation of a certain part of Scott street in the city of Peru, alleging that they were the owners of the abutting property and all other real estate to be affected by the proposed vacation. Notice by publication was duly given, that on October 5, 1908, the petition would be heard. On October 6, 1908, proof of publication of such notice was made and the court requested to grant the prayer of appellees’ petition, but the demand for judgment was refused, and over appellees’ objection the court called the city attorney of Peru by telephone,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Isenhour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Central Union Telephone Co. v. FehringIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Maule Coal Co. v. PartenheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Town of Windfall City v. State ex rel. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Gustavel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wever v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- Bob Layne Contractor, Inc. v. BuennagelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Smith v. BiesiadaIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Southern Railway Co. v. Town of French LickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- City of Indianapolis v. Stutz Motor Car Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.