Isenhour v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Erara Marion Criminal Conrt; Fremont Alford, Judge. Luther J. Isenhour was convicted of violating the pure food law of 1899, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
Appellant was convicted on an affidavit charging him with “unlawfully and knowingly having in his possession, with intent to sell the same, a certain substance *520intended for food, to wit, one pint of milk then and there adulterated with a certain substance inj urious to health, to Avit, formaldehyde”. Appellant’s motions to quash the affidavit, and for a new trial, were overruled. Section 2 of the act of 1899, commonly known as the pure food law (Acts 1899, p. 189) in part provides: “Whoever fraudulently adulterates, for the purpose of sale, bread or any other substance intended for food with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Blue v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.