Legal Opinion

Mackintosh

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rtjgg, C.J,

This is a petition to establish the truth of exceptions alleged to have-been taken at a trial before a jury *139in the Superior Court. The bill of exceptions as filed was disallowed simply because not in conformity with the truth. No certificate of further reasons was filed by the judge. The case was referred to a commissioner and is considered upon his report. Sixteen exceptions were claimed in the bill as filed. Of these the commissioner found that six were not saved as stated, and that five related to questions put and excluded, as to some of which an offer of proof was stated in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Energy Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Cook v. Enterprise Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. HoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mackintosh v. ChambersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America v. Sonus Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Stevens v. William S. Howe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Spilios v. PappsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Commonwealth v. CassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API