Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Thorndike

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C.J.

These are two petitions to establish the truth of exceptions alleged to have been saved respecting proceedings in an action at law wherein the petitioner was plaintiff and William G. Rantoul defendant.

The petitions with accompanying papers are exceedingly verbose and contain much irrelevant matter. The question whether on that ground they ought to be dismissed is not considered. See Isenbeck v. Burroughs, 217 Mass. 537; Corsick v. Boston Elevated Railway, 218 Mass. 144; Romana v. Boston Elevated Railway, 218 Mass. 76, 81; John B. Frey Co. Inc. v. S. Silk, Inc. 245 Mass. 534, 537. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Clark v. McNeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Mills v. Magee Carpet Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Ayer v. Commissioners on Height of BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hartmann v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Commonwealth v. GricusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Matsushita Electric Corp. of America v. Sonus Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Graustein v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Commonwealth v. McGrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API