Legal Opinion

Horan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1911PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

This is a petition to prove a bill of exceptions which was disallowed as not conformable to the truth. It appears by the commissioner’s report that there was but one exception taken at the trial, and that another was afterwards taken to the consideration of certain evidence by the judge, which consideration he disclosed by his memorandum of his findings. Besides these two exceptions, the bill, as filed, set forth another as having been taken at the trial. In his certificate of disallowance the judge * said: “ The bill does not make a truthful statement of the case, as the narrative throughout…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Goldman v. AshkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Energy Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Moneyweight Scale Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API