Legal Opinion
Mackintosh v. Chambers
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 27, 1934PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract. The two counts in the plaintiff’s declaration are alleged to be for the same cause of action. Allegations (common to both, counts) are that the “plaintiff says that the said defendants owe him” a specified sum of money with interest “for a balance due of money” (in count 1) “received by the defendants to the plaintiff’s use” and (in count 2) “lent by the said plaintiff to the said defendants.” The defendant Chambers pleaded general denial. The defendant Turner pleaded general denial and res judicata. It is stated in the exceptions that the plaintiff, an attorney…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Chelsea Moving & Trucking Co. v. Ross Towboat Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Canning v. ShippeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Newhall v. Enterprise Mining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Francis A. Willhauck, Jr. v. Paul HalpinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Steve Isaac v. William SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.