Legal Opinion
Peden v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 2004No. Docket 119408PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.
We granted leave to appeal to consider two issues: (1) whether defendant, the city of Detroit, Detroit Police Department, properly characterized the essential functions or duties of a police officer position under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 USC 12101 et seq., and the Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act (PWDCRA), MCL 37.1101 et seq.-, and (2) whether plaintiff, who suffers from a permanent heart condition, has presented prima facie evidence that he is able to perform the essential func*198tions of this position. Regarding the first issue, the circuit court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Raytheon Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- John Doe v. University of Maryland Medical System CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Office Planning Group, Inc v. Baraga-Houghton-Keweenaw Child Development BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Bell v. PorterDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Cummings v. Dean Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Salim v. MGM Grand Detroit, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- White v. Telcom Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.