Legal Opinion

Office Planning Group, Inc v. Baraga-Houghton-Keweenaw Child Development Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2005No. Docket 125448PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiff is a disappointed bidder that seeks disclosure from defendant of bid documents under 42 USC 9839(a), a provision of the federal Head Start Act1 *482that requires Head Start agencies to provide for “reasonable public access” to information. Defendant Head Start agency contends that the act does not create a private cause of action to enforce its provisions. We hold that the Head Start Act does not contemplate a private cause of action seeking disclosure of the contested bid documents under § 9839(a). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and enter judgment in favor…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Walters v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of South Haven v. Van Buren County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Grajczyk v. TascaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API