Legal Opinion

Capital Transit Co. v. Hoage

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 27, 1936No. 6547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This case arises under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (44 Stat. 1424 ; 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950 [made applicable to the District of Columbia 45 Stat. 600; D.C.Code 1929, tit. 19, c. 2, §§ 11, 12, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901, note]).

The case involves a claim for compensation filed with the Deputy Commissioner of Compensation, for death benefits in behalf of the widow and minor children of John S. Parrott, deceased, who died as a result of electrocution while working in the repair shop of the Capital Transit Company, a self-insuring corporation.

The employer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Waskevitz v. Clifton Paper Board Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Burns Steamship Co. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. Claim of Burns v. Merritt Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API