Claim of Burns v. Merritt Engineering Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentFuld, J.
A company rule forbade the drinking of intoxicating liquor and an agreement between the employer and the union, of which the employees were members, rendered a violation of that rule basis for “ immediate dismissal.” The rule was, as noted in the court’s opinion (p. 133) “ accepted and obeyed by the employees,” and there is not the slightest evidence either that any employee had ever before taken a drink while on the job, that the employer by word or conduct had ever relaxed the rule, or that it had ever indicated that it would permit drinking on the premises. Under such circumstances, it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Matter of Industrial Comr. (Siguin) v. McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Matter of Ognibene v. Rochester Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Elliott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Oklahoma Railway Co. v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.