May v. Credit Industrial Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
On application for rehearing we think that there is just criticism of the opinion which should be corrected. For example, we stated that the attack on the judgment rendered in favor of Credit Industrial Company, a corporation, v. W. E. May could not be assailed on collateral attack. There is no doubt, however, that the attack on the judgment in the present case is a direct attack. Russell v. Mitchell, 267 Ala. 358, 102 So.2d 14; Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. Morris, 252 Ala. 566, 42 So.2d 240. Accordingly, the original opinion is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bolden v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Barrow v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Rowe v. Big Sandy Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Ashurst v. Arnold-Henegar-Doyle Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clements v. BarberCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Dollar v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961