Legal Opinion

Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. Morris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1949No. 1 Div. 361PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The questions on this appeal are primarily controlled by the legal effect of a decree of the circuit court, in equity, in reliance upon what is known as the Grove Act, which authorizes a proceeding in rem to clear up the title to land and which is now Article 2, Chapter 32, Title 7, Code of 1940, sections 1116 to 1132.

Appellants’ predecessor was the complainant in that suit and appellants were plaintiffs in the instant suit, appealing from a verdict and judgment for defendants.

The decree in equity under the Grove Act, supra, was rendered October 10, 1927. It adjudged that Old…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Craig v. RootSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Bolden v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Keenum v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Claunch v. EntrekinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Stokes v. CottrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. Ex Parte OvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Williams v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API