Legal Opinion

Barrow v. Lindsey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1935No. 5 Div. 186PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Bill in double aspects — one as a bill of review, and the other as an original bill in the nature of a bill of review, to impeach a decree of the chancery court obtained, so it is alleged, by fraud, accident, surprise, or mistake.

While some of the pleadings culminating in the decree attacked by the bill are brought forward in the bill now before us, confessedly the bill fails to present a complete record of the case, noticeably the decree. We have no reference, of course, to the omission of the evidence upon which the decree was rendered.

The record before us discloses that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Evans v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Ingram v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Florence Gin Co. v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Taylor v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. McDougald's Adm'r v. DoughertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1864

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Maddox v. HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. Cook v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Little v. PeevySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Fletcher v. First Nat. Bank of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API