Legal Opinion
Bolden v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 18, 1925No. 6 Div. 407PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The bill is to enjoin a judgment at law for fraud in its procurement. The appeal is from a decree overruling demurrers to the bill.
The case made by the bill and exhibits is in substance this:
John Hughley, an employee of complainant, was killed by accident under conditions entitling a lawful wife, as a legal dependent, to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law (Laws 1919, p. 206). Thereafter the respondent "Mary Belle Bolden, alias Mary Belle Hughley," filed her petition in the circuit court claiming compensation as the dependent wife of the deceased employee. On the hearing the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Evans v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Mudd v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Levine v. LevineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Schillerstrom v. SchillerstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Duncan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.