Legal Opinion
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Louisiana
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 14, 1940No. 286PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230, 236; Holmes v. Conway, 241 U. S. 624, 631-632; Hardware Dealers Insurance Co. v. Glidden Co., 284 U. S. 151, 158.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Herndon v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Godchaux Co. v. EstopinalSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Daspit v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Daspit v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1941