Legal Opinion

Daspit v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 5, 1942No. 36156PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

This is a controversy between attorneys for the division of the attorney’s fee resulting from a judgment obtained by the State of Louisiana against the Sinclair Refining Company for delinquent gasoline taxes and the. attorney’s fee allowed by statute. State v. Sinclair Refining Company, 195 La. 288, 196 So. 349, in which, on motion of the State, an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States was dismissed. See Sinclair Refining Company, Appellant, v. State of Louisiana, 311 U.S. 609, 61 S.Ct. 39, 85 L.Ed. 386.

After the judgment against the Sinclair Refining Company had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scurto v. Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. State v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Daspit v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Sinclair Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Broadmoor, LLC v. ERNEST N. MORIAL EXHIBITIONSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. McCann v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  3. Pillsbury Mills, Inc. v. ChehardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Hero & Company v. Farnsworth & Chambers Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  5. Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API