Legal Opinion

Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 22, 1919No. 101PublishedCited by 48 opinions

ERROR TÓ THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

By petition filed in the District Court, St. Bernard Parish, plaintiff in error sought to restrain collection of an acreage tax assessed against its lands not susceptible of gravity drainage. Invalidity of the tax was alleged upon the ground that no statute of Louisiana authorized it and also because its enforcement would produce practical confiscation and take property without due process of law contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment. . Answering, defendant in error asked dismissal of the petition, claiming the tax was properly assessed and also that an amendment to Article 281 of. the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. McGrewSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. TaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Radio Station Wow, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Herndon v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API