Legal Opinion
Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1988No. 86-6347PublishedCited by 629 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
Phillip Emrich and Eric Gillberg (plaintiffs) appeal the district court’s grant of Touche Ross & Co., et al.’s (defendants) motion to dismiss the action with prejudice in plaintiffs’ suit alleging violations of federal and state securities laws, California common law, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Emrich and Gillberg challenge the district court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the removed action and its ruling on the motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), that all causes of action in the complaint were time barred. We affirm…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by629 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
624 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.