Legal Opinion

Redwing v. Moncravie

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1933No. Docket No. 7751PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.

This is an action for the recovery of special damages resulting from personal injuries to a guest passenger in an automobile, alleged to have been suffered by her because of the intoxication, wilful misconduct or gross negligence of the driver of the car. The action was commenced in this form because of the statute, in force at the time the action was begun, limiting the common-law right of guest passengers to recover against their host drivers to cases of intoxication, wilful misconduct or gross negligence. The question of intoxication was eliminated from the cause at the trial. The injured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Moody v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Kelly v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Matthew v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Shelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Wetzstein v. ThomassonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API