Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1980No. 14573PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Petitioner, Patricia Hunt, by this special action seeks to require respondents to allow her, pursuant to A.R.S. § 32-261 D, to be represented by a non-attorney in her appeal hearing before the respondent Marico-pa County Employees Merit System Commission.
The issue presented is whether the provisions of A.R.S. § 32-261 D constitute an *261unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers provision of Article III of the Arizona Constitution.
The essential facts are that the petitioner is employed as a legal clerk in the office of the Clerk of the Maricopa County…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- West Virginia State Bar v. EarleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Solomon Feldman, Jr. v. State Board of Law ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hoover v. RonwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McCoy v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Petition of BursonTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Henize v. GilesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.