State v. Green
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
Appellant James Green appeals from his first and second-degree murder and attempted murder convictions arising out of the shooting of three people during the course of a robbery. Green argues that the district court’s submission of two pattern jury instructions — CRIMJIG 4.01 (accomplice liability) and CRIMJIG 4.04 (flight raising a permissive inference of guilt) — denied him a fair trial. Green raises several other pro se arguments. We affirm.
Relationships and Roles of the Participants
On January 11, 2004, Green was spending the day with his friend, Daniel Valtier-ra,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. LitzauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PorteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- James Michael Green v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Lionel Curtis DrewCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007