Legal Opinion

State v. Fields

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 2007No. A04-2474PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

In 2004, a jury in Otter Tail County convicted respondent William Leroy Fields of criminal sexual conduct for raping K.W. in the summer of 1997. In an unpublished decision, a divided panel of the court of appeals held that the prosecutor’s inquiry into a theft by Fields, an incident unrelated to the rape and not resulting in a conviction, constituted error because the prosecutor did not comply with the procedures for the use of Spreigl evidence. State v. Fields, No. A04-2474, 2006 WL 463524, at *4 (Minn.App. Feb.28, 2006). The court of appeals failed to consider whether…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Colorado v. SegoviaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  4. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. State v. McCraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API