State v. Fields
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
In 2004, a jury in Otter Tail County convicted respondent William Leroy Fields of criminal sexual conduct for raping K.W. in the summer of 1997. In an unpublished decision, a divided panel of the court of appeals held that the prosecutor’s inquiry into a theft by Fields, an incident unrelated to the rape and not resulting in a conviction, constituted error because the prosecutor did not comply with the procedures for the use of Spreigl evidence. State v. Fields, No. A04-2474, 2006 WL 463524, at *4 (Minn.App. Feb.28, 2006). The court of appeals failed to consider whether…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Colorado v. SegoviaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. McCraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.