Hagemann v. Worth
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
In July 1986, eight of the property owners (hereinafter Hagemanns) at the Alta Lake Golf Course brought this action to enjoin Uriah and Lola Worth from providing care to the elderly in their home, alleging violation of a covenant restricting business within the plat. The court found the Worths' use of their home constituted a business, was in violation of the covenant, and therefore issued Hagemanns a permanent injunction against the business use.
The Worths appeal contending the court erred in granting the injunction or, alternatively, the injunction should extend only to the use of their…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Berger v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1958
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Stuart v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Stuart v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.