Breault v. Merrill & Ring Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the municipal court of Duluth, in favor of plaintiffs for $288.97, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Edson, J. Most of the facts are stated in the opinion. The sheriff attached the logs, as mentioned in the opinion, on May 6, 1895, and notice of the levy was duly served on each of the defendants. The judgment in the action to foreclose Breault’s lien was entered April 21, 1897.
1Opinion of the Court
CANTY, J.1
The complaint herein alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff! Breault, one Jackson and one Olson each performed labor in cutting certain pine saw logs; that each duly filed a lien statement therefor in the office of the proper surveyor general; that Jackson and Olson each duly assigned his claim to Breault; that an action was duly commenced by Breault in the district court, and judgment was duly entered in his favor thereon, declaring the sums due on the three claims to be a lien on the logs; that the defendants herein obtained possession of the logs, and converted them to their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Griffin v. ChadbourneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Goodrow v. BuckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Scott & Holston Lumber Co. v. SharvySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- State & Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Rock Island Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- State and R. R. W. H. Comm. v. R.I. M. T. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Disbrow Manufacturing Co. v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Siskiyou MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Siskiyou MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.