Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Chadbourne

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, in each case, by the plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, Young, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.1

These actions were brought to recover for manual labor performed in driving, towing, and cribbing certain logs, and to enforce the amount due as a lien against the logs. They were brought against Lowell Chadbourne and Fred. McLellan, for whom the labor was performed; and afterwards Charles Chadbourne, the owner of the logs, intervened and defended against the claim for a lien. The court below rendered judgment for the debts, but did not adjudge the amounts found due a lien. The plaintiffs appeal.

The plaintiff Griffin did not file for record in the surveyor general’s *127office a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leighton v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  2. Clark v. SchatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  3. Rugg v. HooverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. Red River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Breault v. Merrill & Ring Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. State Bank v. HeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Davis v. Crookston Waterworks, Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API