Goodrow v. Buckley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Case.' Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwood,.0. J.
The plaintiff in this suit claimed to have a lien under Act No. 145, Laws of 1881 (How. Stat. § 8412), for labor upon certain saw-logs described in the declaration, and filed his statement of lien with the county clerk of Manistee county April 12, 1887. The last day’s work claimed is alleged to have been performed by him upon the logs April 6, 1887.
On April 18, 1887, the plaintiff commenced suit under said act by writ of attachment of that date, before a justice of the peace, against the defendant, Robert Rogers, Personal service of the writ was obtained upon the defendant, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bean v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1822
- Rowell v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Bond v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Johnson v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Baker v. M'DuffieNew York Supreme Court · 1840
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Breault v. Merrill & Ring Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Siskiyou MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Siskiyou MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964