Legal Opinion

Sawyer v. County Commissioners

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 14, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Petition for.mandamus. Defendants filed answer and, by agreement of parties, cause was reported to Law Court upon certain agreements and stipulations. Judgment in accordance with opinion. Case stated in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

Mandamus to compel the County Commissioners of Androscoggin to “fix the pay” of the petitioner for services as jail physician.

The case is reported and presents the following questions: First, Can mandamus be properly invoked upon the allegations in the petition and admitted by the return? Second, Who, if either, has the legal right to employ a physician to render medical attendance to sick prisoners confined in jail, the County Commissioners, or the Sheriff? Third, To determine the case upon legal principles.

The solution of these questions depends upon the construction of the statutes…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LewisohnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Beck v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. City of Tulsa v. Hillcrest Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Durrell v. Franklin County CommissionersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  5. State v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API