Legal Opinion

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Pedersen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1999No. 24524PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

Wendy Pedersen, and her minor daughter Kate, appeal from summary judgment in an action for declaratory relief which denied them benefits pursuant to a homeowners insurance policy. The district court held that Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company had no liability under the policy because the claimants fit within “insured” and residency exclusions contained in the policy. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Jeff and Wendy Pedersen resided in Utah until early 1996. Kate Pedersen was born to Jeff and Wendy on April 4, 1994. In March of 1996, Jeff Pedersen gained employment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bonz v. SudweeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. McKay v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kromrei v. AID Ins. Co.(Mut.)Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Nation v. State, Dept. of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Akers v. D.L. White Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Lamprecht v. JORDAN, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Newberry v. MartensIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Dominguez v. Evergreen Resources, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API