Chodos v. Insurance Co. of North America
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RALPH, J. *
Insurance Company of North America (hereinafter INA), a corporation, appeals from a judgment rendered to its insured following a jury verdict of $205,146.71; $200,000, punitive damages; $5,000, emotional distress; and $146.71, compensatory damages.
Appellant, INA, contends as follows:
1. Evidence is wholly insufficient to establish the essential elements of plaintiff’s claims.
2. The judgment is grossly excessive and is the product of passion and prejudice.
3. Trial court committed the following errors of law: (a) Instructing that punitive damages could be awarded not only for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Leslie G. v. Perry & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Downey Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.